Amazon Web Services vs FluidCore
As of , FluidCore lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Amazon Web Services $6.88 (us-east-1) vs FluidCore $5.55 per GPU-hour on-demand — FluidCore is $1.33 (19%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Amazon Web Services | FluidCore | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $6.88 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.55 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.33 (19%) | FluidCore |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $3.43 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.44 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.99 (29%) | FluidCore |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and FluidCore, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Amazon Web Services $6.88 (us-east-1) vs FluidCore $5.55 per GPU-hour on-demand — FluidCore is $1.33 (19%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Amazon Web Services $3.43 (us-east-1) vs FluidCore $2.44 per GPU-hour on-demand — FluidCore is $0.99 (29%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: