Amazon Web Services vs RunComfy
As of , Amazon Web Services lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Amazon Web Services $7.91 (us-east-1) vs RunComfy $9.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Amazon Web Services is $1.68 (17%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Amazon Web Services |  RunComfy | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $7.91 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $9.59 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.68 (17%) | Amazon Web Services |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $3.43 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $4.99 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.56 (31%) | Amazon Web Services |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and RunComfy, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Amazon Web Services $7.91 (us-east-1) vs RunComfy $9.59 per GPU-hour on-demand — Amazon Web Services is $1.68 (17%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Amazon Web Services $3.43 (us-east-1) vs RunComfy $4.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Amazon Web Services is $1.56 (31%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: