GPU EconomyCloud GPU prices, read every hour
Latest read 115 providers tracked27,573 prices read in 24 h
H100 index$3.2736 providersWidestV100 32GB20.0×Mover, 7dL40+7.2%

Amazon Web Services vs Tata Communications

As of , Amazon Web Services and Tata Communications each list the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 4 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Amazon Web Services $7.91 (us-east-1) vs Tata Communications $5.61 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $2.30 (29%) cheaper.

On-demand, per GPU-hour

Each price links to the pricing page it was read from and says when it was read.
GPUAmazon Web ServicesTata CommunicationsDifferenceCheaper
NVIDIA H200
median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29
$7.91
us-east-1
captured
Deploy ↗
$5.61
from
captured
Deploy ↗
$2.30 (29%)Tata Communications
NVIDIA H100 SXM
median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only
$6.88
us-east-1
captured
Deploy ↗
$5.16
from
captured
Deploy ↗
$1.72 (25%)Tata Communications
NVIDIA L40S
median $1.42 · 40 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63
$1.86
us-east-1
captured
Deploy ↗
$2.11
from
captured
Deploy ↗
$0.25 (12%)Amazon Web Services
NVIDIA L4
median $0.80 · 23 providers · lowest Hikube $0.28 GPU only
$0.80
us-east-1
captured
Deploy ↗
$0.95
from
captured
Deploy ↗
$0.15 (15%)Amazon Web Services

How this is compared

Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.

GPU by GPU

Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.

Data updated: