Civo vs QuantaCloud
As of , QuantaCloud lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: Civo $1.79 vs QuantaCloud $1.48 (Midwest - us-midwest-2) per GPU-hour on-demand — QuantaCloud is $0.31 (17%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Civo |  QuantaCloud | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $1.79 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.48 Midwest - us-midwest-2 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.31 (17%) | QuantaCloud |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.42 · 40 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $1.29 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.09 Midwest - us-midwest-2 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.20 (16%) | QuantaCloud |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Civo and QuantaCloud, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Civo $1.79 vs QuantaCloud $1.48 (Midwest - us-midwest-2) per GPU-hour on-demand — QuantaCloud is $0.31 (17%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Civo $1.29 vs QuantaCloud $1.09 (Midwest - us-midwest-2) per GPU-hour on-demand — QuantaCloud is $0.20 (16%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: