CoreWeave vs STACKIT
As of , CoreWeave lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; STACKIT wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: CoreWeave $6.16 vs STACKIT $8.99 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — CoreWeave is $2.83 (32%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  CoreWeave |  STACKIT | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $6.16 captured Deploy ↗ | $8.99 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $2.83 (32%) | CoreWeave |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $2.70 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.97 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $0.27 (9%) | CoreWeave |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.42 · 40 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $2.25 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.95 Germany South captured Deploy ↗ | $0.30 (13%) | STACKIT |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | CoreWeave | STACKIT |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.44 captured | — |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB | $1.19 captured | — |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.98 captured | — |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of CoreWeave and STACKIT, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: CoreWeave $6.16 vs STACKIT $8.99 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — CoreWeave is $2.83 (32%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: CoreWeave $2.70 vs STACKIT $2.97 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — CoreWeave is $0.27 (9%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: CoreWeave $2.25 vs STACKIT $1.95 (Germany South) per GPU-hour on-demand — STACKIT is $0.30 (13%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: