Cudo Compute vs FluidCore
As of , Cudo Compute lists the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 1 GPUs both offer on-demand. Not compared today: 1 more shared GPU, where one side's quote is not confirmed within 48 hours or is a thin market. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Cudo Compute $1.79 (no-kristiansand-1) vs FluidCore $5.55 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $3.76 (68%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Cudo Compute | FluidCore | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $1.79 no-kristiansand-1 · GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $5.55 captured Deploy ↗ | $3.76 (68%) | Cudo Compute |
Shared, not compared today
Both providers quoted these GPUs on-demand within the last 7 days, but at least one quote is not confirmed within 48 hours of the newest read (or is a marketplace floor withheld as too thin), and an unconfirmed price never decides which is cheaper. They return to the table above at the next read that confirms them.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Cudo Compute: unconfirmed
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Cudo Compute and FluidCore, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Cudo Compute $1.79 (no-kristiansand-1) vs FluidCore $5.55 per GPU-hour on-demand — Cudo Compute is $3.76 (68%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: