Verda vs Tata Communications
As of , Verda lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; Tata Communications wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Verda $6.38 vs Tata Communications $5.61 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $0.77 (12%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Verda |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $6.38 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.61 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.77 (12%) | Tata Communications |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $4.89 captured Deploy ↗ | $5.16 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.27 (5%) | Verda |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.42 · 40 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $1.94 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.11 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.17 (8%) | Verda |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Verda | Tata Communications |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 | $3.19 captured | — |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM | $2.44 captured | — |
| NVIDIA L40S | $0.97 captured | — |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Verda and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Verda $6.38 vs Tata Communications $5.61 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $0.77 (12%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Verda $4.89 vs Tata Communications $5.16 per GPU-hour on-demand — Verda is $0.27 (5%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Verda $1.94 vs Tata Communications $2.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Verda is $0.17 (8%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: