Gcore vs Tata Communications
As of , Gcore lists the lower on-demand rate on 3 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.58 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Tata Communications $5.61 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $2.03 (36%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Gcore |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $3.58 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $5.61 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.03 (36%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.07 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $5.16 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.08 (40%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.42 · 40 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $1.22 Everywhere Inference captured Deploy ↗ | $2.11 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.90 (42%) | Gcore |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Gcore and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Gcore $3.58 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Tata Communications $5.61 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $2.03 (36%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Gcore $3.07 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Tata Communications $5.16 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $2.08 (40%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Gcore $1.22 (Everywhere Inference) vs Tata Communications $2.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.90 (42%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: