Gcore vs Thunder Compute
As of , Gcore and Thunder Compute each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H100 SXM: Gcore $3.07 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Thunder Compute $3.20 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.13 (4%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Gcore |  Thunder Compute | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $3.07 Bare Metal GPU Clusters captured Deploy ↗ | $3.20 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.13 (4%) | Gcore |
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $1.42 Everywhere Inference captured Deploy ↗ | $1.09 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.33 (23%) | Thunder Compute |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Gcore and Thunder Compute, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: Gcore $3.07 (Bare Metal GPU Clusters) vs Thunder Compute $3.20 per GPU-hour on-demand — Gcore is $0.13 (4%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Gcore $1.42 (Everywhere Inference) vs Thunder Compute $1.09 per GPU-hour on-demand — Thunder Compute is $0.33 (23%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: