GPU.ai vs Hyperbolic
As of , Hyperbolic lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; GPU.ai wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: GPU.ai $7.99 vs Hyperbolic $5.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $2.00 (25%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  GPU.ai |  Hyperbolic | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $6.94 · 40 providers · lowest Hostinger $4.50 from | $7.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.00 (25%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $5.29 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.30 (25%) | Hyperbolic |
| NVIDIA H100 SXM median $3.29 · 41 providers · lowest Cudo Compute $1.79 GPU only | $2.54 from captured Deploy ↗ | $3.19 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.65 (20%) | GPU.ai |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of GPU.ai and Hyperbolic, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: GPU.ai $7.99 vs Hyperbolic $5.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $2.00 (25%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: GPU.ai $5.29 vs Hyperbolic $3.99 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hyperbolic is $1.30 (25%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 SXM: GPU.ai $2.54 vs Hyperbolic $3.19 per GPU-hour on-demand — GPU.ai is $0.65 (20%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: