Hyperbolic vs Yotta Labs
As of , Yotta Labs lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Yotta Labs $5.37 per GPU-hour on-demand — Yotta Labs is $0.62 (10%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $6.94 · 40 providers · lowest Hostinger $4.50 from | $5.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.37 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.62 (10%) | Yotta Labs |
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $3.99 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.49 (37%) | Yotta Labs |
Spot / interruptible, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Hyperbolic | Yotta Labs |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 | — | $2.20 captured |
| NVIDIA H200 | — | $1.60 captured |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hyperbolic and Yotta Labs, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: Hyperbolic $5.99 vs Yotta Labs $5.37 per GPU-hour on-demand — Yotta Labs is $0.62 (10%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H200: Hyperbolic $3.99 vs Yotta Labs $2.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Yotta Labs is $1.49 (37%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: