immers.cloud vs packet.ai
As of , packet.ai lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA A100 80GB: immers.cloud $2.43 vs packet.ai $1.43 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — packet.ai is $1.00 (41%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  immers.cloud |  packet.ai | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA A100 80GB median $1.99 · 63 providers · lowest Yotta Labs $0.92 | $2.43 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.43 Dedicated captured Deploy ↗ | $1.00 (41%) | packet.ai |
| NVIDIA RTX 4090 median $0.48 · 17 providers · lowest OpenRelay $0.35 | $0.97 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.39 Dedicated captured Deploy ↗ | $0.58 (60%) | packet.ai |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of immers.cloud and packet.ai, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: immers.cloud $2.43 vs packet.ai $1.43 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — packet.ai is $1.00 (41%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA RTX 4090: immers.cloud $0.97 vs packet.ai $0.39 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — packet.ai is $0.58 (60%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: