Sesterce vs Tata Communications
As of , Sesterce lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 3 GPUs both offer on-demand; Tata Communications wins on 1. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Sesterce $5.08 vs Tata Communications $5.61 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.53 (10%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Sesterce |  Tata Communications | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $5.08 from captured Deploy ↗ | $5.61 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.53 (10%) | Sesterce |
| NVIDIA L4 median $0.80 · 23 providers · lowest Hikube $0.28 GPU only | $1.04 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.95 from captured Deploy ↗ | $0.09 (9%) | Tata Communications |
| NVIDIA L40S median $1.42 · 40 providers · lowest CloudRift $0.63 | $0.97 from captured Deploy ↗ | $2.11 from captured Deploy ↗ | $1.14 (54%) | Sesterce |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Sesterce and Tata Communications, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Sesterce $5.08 vs Tata Communications $5.61 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $0.53 (10%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L4: Sesterce $1.04 vs Tata Communications $0.95 per GPU-hour on-demand — Tata Communications is $0.09 (9%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA L40S: Sesterce $0.97 vs Tata Communications $2.11 per GPU-hour on-demand — Sesterce is $1.14 (54%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: