Amazon Web Services vs Enverge
As of , Enverge lists the lower on-demand rate on 2 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B300: Amazon Web Services $17.80 (us-east-1) vs Enverge $9.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Enverge is $8.30 (47%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B300 median $8.99 · 26 providers · lowest Deep Infra $5.89 | $17.80 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $9.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $8.30 (47%) | Enverge |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell median $2.20 · 42 providers · lowest Hostinger $0.65 from | $3.36 us-east-1 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.95 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.41 (42%) | Enverge |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Amazon Web Services and Enverge, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B300: Amazon Web Services $17.80 (us-east-1) vs Enverge $9.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Enverge is $8.30 (47%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: Amazon Web Services $3.36 (us-east-1) vs Enverge $1.95 per GPU-hour on-demand — Enverge is $1.41 (42%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: