fal vs packet.ai
As of , packet.ai lists the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 1 GPUs both offer on-demand. Not counted: 1 more shared GPU, on community capacity or a marketplace floor. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA B200: fal $7.99 vs packet.ai $6.99 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — packet.ai is $1.00 (13%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU | Difference | Cheaper | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA B200 median $6.94 · 40 providers · lowest Hostinger $4.50 from | $7.99 captured Deploy ↗ | $6.99 Dedicated captured Deploy ↗ | $1.00 (13%) | packet.ai |
| NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell median $2.20 · 42 providers · lowest Hostinger $0.65 from | $4.00 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.66 Dynamic captured Deploy ↗ | — | not the same market |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of fal and packet.ai, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA B200: fal $7.99 vs packet.ai $6.99 (Dedicated) per GPU-hour on-demand — packet.ai is $1.00 (13%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: fal $4.00 vs packet.ai $0.66 (Dynamic) per GPU-hour — not the same market, not counted.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: