Hikube vs Phala Cloud
As of , Hikube and Phala Cloud each list the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 2 GPUs both offer on-demand. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA H200: Hikube $4.20 vs Phala Cloud $5.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hikube is $1.30 (24%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Hikube |  Phala Cloud | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA H200 median $4.56 · 56 providers · lowest Dataoorts $2.29 | $4.20 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $5.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.30 (24%) | Hikube |
| NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated) median $3.75 · 28 providers · lowest Gcore $1.72 | $3.36 GPU only captured Deploy ↗ | $3.08 captured Deploy ↗ | $0.28 (8%) | Phala Cloud |
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Hikube and Phala Cloud, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA H200: Hikube $4.20 vs Phala Cloud $5.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Hikube is $1.30 (24%) cheaper.
- NVIDIA H100 80GB (form factor not stated): Hikube $3.36 vs Phala Cloud $3.08 per GPU-hour on-demand — Phala Cloud is $0.28 (8%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: