Lambda vs RunComfy
As of , Lambda lists the lower on-demand rate on 1 of the 1 GPUs both offer on-demand. Not compared today: 1 more shared GPU, where one side's quote is not confirmed within 48 hours or is a thin market. On the priciest shared card both list on-demand, NVIDIA RTX A6000: Lambda $1.09 vs RunComfy $2.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Lambda is $1.41 (56%) cheaper.
On-demand, per GPU-hour
| GPU |  Lambda |  RunComfy | Difference | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 median $0.59 · 21 providers · lowest Thunder Compute $0.35 | $1.09 captured Deploy ↗ | $2.50 captured Deploy ↗ | $1.41 (56%) | Lambda |
Shared, not compared today
Both providers quoted these GPUs on-demand within the last 7 days, but at least one quote is not confirmed within 48 hours of the newest read (or is a marketplace floor withheld as too thin), and an unconfirmed price never decides which is cheaper. They return to the table above at the next read that confirms them.
- NVIDIA A100 80GB: Lambda: unconfirmed
How this is compared
Cloud GPU rental prices of Lambda and RunComfy, compared per GPU-hour on the GPUs both list. Where a provider has several tiers or regions, its cheapest on-demand rate is used and labelled. Community capacity (RunPod Community Cloud) and marketplace floors are shown only where a provider has nothing else, and never decide which is cheaper.
GPU by GPU
- NVIDIA RTX A6000: Lambda $1.09 vs RunComfy $2.50 per GPU-hour on-demand — Lambda is $1.41 (56%) cheaper.
Not compared: GPUs only one of the two lists, reserved/committed tiers, and anything either provider prices only on request. See each provider's page for its full list.
Data updated: